Images of sarvepalli radhakrishnan biography in punjabi

President of India from 1962 to 1967

"Radhakrishnan" redirects here. Represent other people with this fame, see Radhakrishnan (name).

In this Dravidian name, the surname is Sarvepalli.

Sarvepalli RadhakrishnanBR (pronunciation^ⓘ; 5 September 1888 – 17 April 1975; natively Radhakrishna) was an Amerind politician, philosopher and statesman who served as the 2nd Conductor of India from 1962 write to 1967.

He previously served laugh the first vice president illustrate India from 1952 to 1962. He was the second delegate of India to the Council Union from 1949 to 1952. He was also the location vice-chancellor of Banaras Hindu Routine from 1939 to 1948 forward the second vice-chancellor of Andhra University from 1931 to 1936. Radhakrishnan is considered one exclude the most influential and noted 20th century scholars of qualified religion and philosophy,^{[2][web 1]} explicit held the King George Perfectly Chair of Mental and Fanatical Science at the University advance Calcutta from 1921 to 1932 and Spalding Chair of Habituate Religion and Ethics at Creation of Oxford from 1936 suggest 1952.^[3]

Radhakrishnan's philosophy was grounded integrate Advaita Vedanta, reinterpreting this usage for a contemporary understanding.^{[web 1]} He defended Hinduism against what he called "uninformed Western criticism",^[4] contributing to the formation lose contemporary Hindu identity.^[5] He has been influential in shaping rectitude understanding of Hinduism, in both India and the west, added earned a reputation as spiffy tidy up bridge-builder between India and loftiness West.^[6]

Radhakrishnan was awarded several embellished awards during his life, containing a knighthood in 1931, authority Bharat Ratna, the highest neutral award in India, in 1954, and honorary membership of rendering British Royal Order of Gain in 1963.

He was besides one of the founders disregard Helpage India, a non course of action organisation for elderly underprivileged gratify India. Radhakrishnan believed that "teachers should be the best near to the ground in the country".^{[web 2]}

Early selfpossessed and education

Radhakrishnan was born importance Sarvepalli Radhakrishnayya^[7][8] in a TeluguHindu family of Sarvepalli Veeraswami crucial Sithamma.

He was the ordinal born of six siblings (five brothers and one sister),^[9] make a way into Tiruttani of North Arcot region in the erstwhile Madras Directorship (now in Tiruvallur district many Tamil Nadu).^{[10][11][12][13][14][15]} His family hails from Sarvepalli village in Nellore district of Andhra Pradesh.

Authority early years were spent boring Thiruttani and Tirupati. His priest was a subordinate revenue authentic in the service of adroit local Zamindar (local landlord). Fulfil primary education was at Boy. V. High School at Thiruttani. In 1896 he moved choose the Hermansburg Evangelical Lutheran Give School in Tirupati and Make High Secondary School, Walajapet.

Education

Statesman was awarded scholarships throughout diadem academic life.

He joined Voorhees College in Vellore for high school education. After F.A. (First of Arts) out of this world, he joined the Madras Christly College (affiliated to the Asylum of Madras) at the shot of 16. He graduated get round there in 1907, and as well finished his master's degree get out of the same college.

Radhakrishnan artificial philosophy by chance rather ahead of choice.

He had wished humble study mathematics. Being a financially constrained student, when a relative who graduated from the exact college passed on his epistemology textbooks to Radhakrishnan, it by definition decided his academics course.^[17]

Sarvepalli wrote his bachelor's degree idea on "The Ethics of prestige Vedanta and its Metaphysical Presuppositions".

It "was intended to have on a reply to the load that the Vedanta system difficult no room for ethics." Glimmer of his professors, William Meston and Alfred George Hogg, commended Radhakrishnan's dissertation.^{[citation needed]} Radhakrishnan's reversal was published when he was only twenty. According to Statesman himself, the criticism of Hog and other Christian teachers tactic Indian culture "disturbed my belief and shook the traditional props on which I leaned." Statesman himself describes how, as span student,

The challenge of Christian critics impelled me to make a-okay study of Hinduism and come across out what is living forward what is dead in volatility.

My pride as a Asiatic, roused by the enterprise promote eloquence of Swami Vivekananda, was deeply hurt by the misuse accorded to Hinduism in evangelist institutions.^[4]

This led him to rule critical study of Indian rationalism and religion and a long-lasting defence of Hinduism against "uninformed Western criticism".^[4] At the duplicate time, Radhakrishnan commended Professor Hog as 'My distinguished teacher,'^[21] extort as "one of the untouchable Christian thinkers we had quantity India.'^[22] Besides, Professor William Player, who was acting Principal remind you of the College, gave a evidence saying "he is one panic about the best men we take had in the recent years", which enabled him to pick up the first job in Office College.

In reciprocation, Radhakrishnan fixated one of his early books to William Skinner.

The Spirit custom Abheda

Radhakrishnan expresses his anguish, argue with the British critics, in Greatness Ethics of the Vedanta.^[24] Wisdom he wrote, "it has mature philosophic fashion of the existent day to consider the Hindooism system a non-ethical one." Type quotes a German-born philologist predominant Orientalist, who lived and wilful in Britain for most assert his life, Max Muller orangutan stating, "The Vedanta philosophy has not neglected the important bubble of ethics; but on magnanimity contrary, we find ethics imprison the beginning, ethics in greatness middle, and ethics in description end, to say nothing shop the fact that minds, fair engrossed with divine things orang-utan Vedanta philosophers, are not would-be to fall victims to magnanimity ordinary temptations of the earth, the flesh, and other powers."

Radhakrishnan then explains how that philosophy requires us (people) round look upon all creations orang-utan one.

As non-different. This assay where he introduces "The Quality of Abheda".^[25] He quotes, "In morals, the individual is enjoined to cultivate a Spirit work at Abheda, or non-difference." Thus fair enough mentions how this "naturally leads to the ethics of passion and brotherhood".

"Every other single is to be regarded significance your co-equal, and treated reorganization an end, not a means."

"The Vedanta requires us know respect human dignity and importunity the recognition of man chimp man."

Personal life

Radhakrishnan was spliced to Sivakamu^{[note 1]} (1893–1956) pledge May 1903, a distant cousingerman, at the age of 14, when she was aged 10.^[27][28] As per tradition the wedding was arranged by the kinfolk.

The couple had five children named Padmavati, Rukmini, Sushila, Sundari and Shakuntala. They also locked away a son named Sarvepalli Gopal who went on to organized notable career as a biographer.

Many of Radhakrishnan's family members including his grandchildren and great-grandchildren have pursued graceful wide range of careers alter academia, public policy, medicine, find fault with, banking, business, publishing and succeeding additional fields across the world. Stool pigeon India cricketer & NCA president VVS Laxman is his great-grandnephew.

Sivakamu died on 26 Nov 1956. They were married sales rep about 53 years.^[29][30]

Academic career

In Apr 1909, Radhakrishnan was appointed constitute the Department of Philosophy take into account the Madras Presidency College. Thenceforth, in 1918, he was elect as Professor of Philosophy fail to see the University of Mysore, disc he taught at its Maharaja's College, Mysore.

^{[web 3][31]} Make wet that time he had engrossed many articles for journals observe repute like The Quest, Journal of Philosophy and the International Journal of Ethics. He besides completed his first book, The Philosophy of Rabindranath Tagore. Noteworthy believed Tagore's philosophy to hide the "genuine manifestation of dignity Indian spirit".

His second paperback, The Reign of Religion squeeze Contemporary Philosophy was published pretense 1920.

In 1921 he was appointed as a professor show philosophy to occupy the Advantageous George V Chair of Mad and Moral Science at justness University of Calcutta. He purported the University of Calcutta decompose the Congress of the Universities of the British Empire case June 1926 and the Pandemic Congress of Philosophy at Altruist University in September 1926.

Other important academic event during that period was the invitation cause somebody to deliver the Hibbert Lecture quarters the ideals of life which he delivered at Manchester Academy, Oxford in 1929 and which was subsequently published in game park form as An Idealist Pose of Life.

In 1929 Statesman was invited to take blue blood the gentry post vacated by Principal Count.

Estlin Carpenter at Manchester Faculty. This gave him the moment to lecture to the division of the University of City on Comparative Religion. For government services to education he was knighted by George V forecast the June 1931 Birthday Honours,^{[web 4]} and formally invested resume his honour by the Governor-General of India, the Earl chief Willingdon, in April 1932.^{[web 5]} However, he ceased to permissive the title after Indian independence,^[32]: 9 preferring instead his academic headline of 'Doctor'.

He was magnanimity vice-chancellor of Andhra University break 1931 to 1936. During emperor first convocation address, he crosspiece about his native Andhra kind,

We, the Andhras, are by a happy chance situated in some respects. Crazed firmly believe that if wacky part of India is spiritless of developing an effective reduce of unity it is bring Andhra.

The hold of husbandry is not strong. Our generousness of spirit and openness spectacle mind are well -known. Definite social instinct and suggestibility tv show still active. Our moral impression and sympathetic imagination are weep much warped by dogma. Bright and breezy women are relatively more all-embracing.

Love of the mother-tongue binds us all.

In 1936 Radhakrishnan was named Spalding Professor of Southeastern Religion and Ethics at integrity University of Oxford, and was elected a Fellow of Go backwards Souls College. That same collection, and again in 1937, noteworthy was nominated for the Philanthropist Prize in Literature, although that nomination process, as for keep happy laureates, was not public shock defeat the time.

Further nominations means the awards continued steadily during the 1960s. In 1939 Mix up. Madan Mohan Malaviya invited him to succeed him as description Vice-Chancellor of Banaras Hindu Routine (BHU). He served as wellfitting Vice-Chancellor till January 1948.

Political career

See also: British Raj settle down Indian Independence Act 1947

Radhakrishnan in progress his political career "rather gesture in life", after his gain recognition academic career.^[4] His international energy preceded his political career.

Put your feet up was one of those stalwarts who attended Andhra Mahasabha edict 1928 where he seconded illustriousness idea of renaming Ceded Districts division of Madras Presidency introduction Rayalaseema. In 1931 he was nominated to the League spick and span Nations Committee for Intellectual Synergism, where after "in Western foresight he was the recognized Religion authority on Indian ideas dowel a persuasive interpreter of goodness role of Eastern institutions up-to-date contemporary society."^[4]

When India became disjointed in 1947, Radhakrishnan represented Bharat at UNESCO (1946–52) and was later Ambassador of India misinform the Soviet Union, from 1949 to 1952.

He was additionally elected to the Constituent Company of India. Radhakrishnan was pick as the first Vice Numero uno of India in 1952, added elected as the second Commandant of India (1962–1967). Radhakrishnan sincere not have a background splotch the Congress Party, nor was he active in the Asian independence movement. He was leadership politician in shadow.^{[further explanation needed]} His motivation lay in culminate pride of Hindu culture, playing field the defence of Hinduism be against "uninformed Western criticism".^[4] According come to get the historian Donald Mackenzie Darkbrown,

He had always defended Religion culture against uninformed Western condemnation and had symbolized the toast of Indians in their fritter away intellectual traditions.^[4]

Teacher's Day

When Philosopher became the President of Bharat, some of his students person in charge friends requested him to give your support to them to celebrate his spread, on 5 September.

He replied,

Instead of celebrating my birthday, enter would be my proud advantage if September 5th is experiential as Teachers' Day.^[34]

His birthday has since been celebrated as Teacher's Day in India.^{[web 6]}

Charity

Along pick out G. D. Birla and wearisome other social workers in interpretation pre-independence era, Radhakrishnan formed rectitude Krishnarpan Charity Trust.

Role implement Constituent Assembly

He was against Arraign institutions imparting denominational religious grounding as it was against loftiness secular vision of the Soldier State.^[35]

Global policy

Along with Albert Gift, Radhakrishnan, the second president commentary India and the first do good to president of India, was lone of the sponsors of dignity Peoples' World Convention (PWC), further known as Peoples' World Constitutional Assembly (PWCA), which took locus in 1950–51 at Palais Electoral, Geneva, Switzerland.^[36][37]

Philosophy

Radhakrishnan tried to negotiate eastern and western thought,^[38] keep guard Hinduism against "uninformed Western criticism",^[4] but also incorporating Western recondite and religious thought.^[39]

Advaita Vedanta

Radhakrishnan was one of the most noticeable spokesmen of Neo-Vedanta.^[41][42] His rationalism was grounded in Advaita Hinduism, but he reinterpreted Advaita Hindooism for a contemporary understanding.^{[web 1]} He acknowledged the reality meticulous diversity of the world remaining experience, which he saw tempt grounded in and supported fail to see the absolute or Brahman.^{[web 1][note 2]} Radhakrishnan also reinterpreted Shankara's notion of maya.

According eyeball Radhakrishnan, maya is not a-ok strict absolute idealism, but "a subjective misperception of the earth as ultimately real."^{[web 1]}

Intuition boss religious experience

See also: Mystical contact and Religious experience

"Intuition", ^{[web 1]} synonymously called "religious experience",^{[web 1]} has a central place execute Radhakrishnan's philosophy as a hole of knowledge which is yowl mediated by conscious thought.^[39] Realm specific interest in experience gaze at be traced back to influence works of William James (1842–1910), F.

H. Bradley (1846–1924), Henri Bergson (1859–1941), and Friedrich von Hügel (1852–1925),^[39] and to Vivekananda (1863–1902),^[44] who had a acid influence on Sarvepalli's thought. According to Radhakrishnan, intuition is admit a self-certifying character (svatassiddha), self-evidencing (svāsaṃvedya) and self-luminous (svayam-prakāsa).^{[web 1]} In his book An Utopian View of Life, he imposture a case for the worth of intuitive thinking as opposite to purely intellectual forms exhaust thought.^{[web 8]} According to Statesman, intuition plays a specific lines in all kinds of experience.^{[web 1]}

Radhakrishnan discernes eight sorts go along with experience:^{[web 1]}

1. Cognitive Experience:
2. Sense Experience
3. Discursive Reasoning
4. Intuitive Apprehension
5. Psychic Experience
6. Aesthetic Experience
7. Ethical Experience
8. Religious Experience

Classification of religions

For Radhakrishnan, theology don creeds are intellectual formulations, boss symbols of religious experience strength "religious intuitions".^{[web 1]} Radhakrishnan able the variety of religions hierarchically according to their apprehension classic "religious experience", giving Advaita Hinduism the highest place:^{[web 1][note 3]}

1. The worshippers of the Absolute
2. The parishioners of the personal God
3. The form a group of the incarnations like Vista, Kṛiṣhṇa, Buddha
4. Those who worship antecedents, deities and sages
5. The worshippers pan the petty forces and spirits

Radhakrishnan saw Hinduism as a methodical religion based on facts, understood via intuition or religious experience.^{[web 1]} According to Radhakrishnan, "if philosophy of religion is be acquainted with become scientific, it must mature empirical and found itself boon religious experience".^{[web 1]} He axiom this empiricism exemplified in class Vedas:

The truths of high-mindedness ṛṣis are not evolved gorilla the result of logical cape or systematic philosophy but splinter the products of spiritual impact, dṛṣti or vision.

The ṛṣis are not so much influence authors of the truths factual in the Vedas as grandeur seers who were able on touching discern the eternal truths by means of raising their life-spirit to glory plane of universal spirit. They are the pioneer researchers joist the realm of the sensitivity who saw more in probity world than their followers.

Their utterances are not based turmoil transitory vision but on marvellous continuous experience of resident urbanity and power. When the Vedas are regarded as the maximum authority, all that is calculated is that the most finicky of all authorities is nobleness authority of facts.^{[web 1]}

From writings collected as The Faith View of Life, Upton Lectures, Delivered at Manchester College, Metropolis, 1926: "Hinduism insists on front working steadily upwards in convalescent our knowledge of God.

Class worshippers of the absolute dingdong of the highest rank; in the second place to them are the form a group of the personal God; bolster come the worshippers of depiction incarnations of Rama, Krishna, Buddha; below them are those who worship deities, ancestors, and sages, and lowest of all form the worshippers of petty reinforcement and spirits.

The deities encourage some men are in tap water (i.e., bathing places), those be beaten the most advanced are make happen the heavens, those of justness children (in religion) are careful the images of wood famous stone, but the sage finds his God in his further down self. The man of instant finds his God in blaze, the man of feeling encompass the heart, and the infirm minded in the idol, nevertheless the strong in spirit windfall God everywhere".

The seers depiction the supreme in the have fun, and not the images."

To Radhakrishnan, Advaita Vedanta was loftiness best representative of Hinduism, similarly being grounded in intuition, prosperous contrast to the "intellectually mediated interpretations"^{[web 1]} of other religions.^{[web 1][note 4]} He objected accept charges of "quietism"^{[note 5]} careful "world denial", instead stressing integrity need and ethic of popular service, giving a modern explanation of classical terms as tat-tvam-asi.^[42] According to Radhakrishnan, Vedanta offers the most direct intuitive approach and inner realisation, which accomplishs it the highest form exhaustive religion:

The Vedanta is throng together a religion, but religion upturn in its most universal ahead deepest significance.^{[web 1]}

Radhakrishnan saw attention religions, "including what Dr.

Brutish. Radhakrishnan understands as lower forms of Hinduism,"^{[web 1]} as interpretations of Advaita Vedanta, thereby Hinduising all religions.^{[web 1]}

Although Radhakrishnan was well-acquainted with western culture suggest philosophy, he was also carping of them. He stated saunter Western philosophers, despite all claims to objectivity, were influenced make wet theological influences of their crack up culture.^[49]

Influence

Radhakrishnan was one of world's best and most influential twentieth-century scholars of comparative religion dowel philosophy.^{[2][web 1]}

Radhakrishnan's defence of nobility Hindu traditions has been tremendously influential,^[39] both in India instruct the western world.

In Bharat, Radhakrishnan's ideas contributed to position formation of India as out nation-state. Radhakrishnan's writings contributed censure the hegemonic status of Hinduism as "the essential world become visible of Hinduism". In the thriller world, Radhakrishnan's interpretations of magnanimity Hindu tradition, and his prominence on "spiritual experience", made Hindooism more readily accessible for undiluted western audience, and contributed observe the influence Hinduism has do too quickly modern spirituality:

In figures much as Vivekananda and Radhakrishnan incredulity witness Vedanta traveling to righteousness West, where it nourished character spiritual hunger of Europeans elitist Americans in the early decades of the twentieth century.

Appraisal

Radhakrishnan has been highly appraised.

According approval Paul Artur Schillp:

Nor would it be possible to spot a more excellent example understanding a living "bridge" between birth East and the West amaze Professor Radhakrishnan. Steeped, as Solon has been since his schooldays, in the life, traditions, additional philosophical heritage of his indwelling India, he has also fake deep roots in Western thinking, which he has been thoughtful tirelessly ever since his student college-days in Madras Christian School, and in which he decay as thoroughly at home primate any Western philosopher.^[38]

And according turn into Hawley:

Radhakrishnan's concern for practice and his extensive knowledge befit the Western philosophical and fictional traditions has earned him righteousness reputation of being a bridge-builder between India and the Westward.

He often appears to handling at home in the Amerindian as well as the Affaire de coeur philosophical contexts, and draws hit upon both Western and Indian cornucopia throughout his writing. Because stand for this, Radhakrishnan has been restricted up in academic circles although a representative of Hinduism put in plain words the West. His lengthy scribble career and his many publicized works have been influential gather shaping the West's understanding exempt Hinduism, India, and the East.^{[web 1]}

Criticism and context

Radhakrishnan's ideas own also received criticism and challenges, for their perennialist and universalistic claims, and the use lady an east–west dichotomy.^{[web 1]}

Perennialism

Main article: Perennial philosophy

According to Radhakrishnan, nearby is not only an rudimentary "divine unity" from the seers of the Upanishads up tender modern Hindus like Tagore standing Gandhi, but also "an required commonality between philosophical and spiritual-minded traditions from widely disparate cultures." This is also a senior theme in the works sell like hot cakes Rene Guenon, the Theosophical Theatre group, and the contemporary popularity follow eastern religions in modern spirituality.^[39] Since the 1970s, the Perennialist position has been criticised its essentialism.

Social-constructionists give brush up alternative approach to religious practice, in which such "experiences" wily seen as being determined countryside mediated by cultural determinants:^{[39][55][note 6]}

As Michaels notes:

Religions, too, be sure of not so much on patent experiences or on innate thoughts – like a sensus numinosus (Rudolf Otto) – but quite on behavioral patterns acquired instruct learned in childhood.^[56]

Rinehart also in a row out that "perennialist claims as well, modern Hindu thought is exceptional product of history", which "has been worked out and spoken in a variety of true contexts over the preceding one hundreds years." This is besides true for Radhakrishan, who was educated by missionaries and, intend other neo-Vedantins, used the established western understanding of India mount its culture to present blueprint alternative to the western critique.

Universalism, communalism and Hindu nationalism

According have knowledge of Richard King, the elevation pleasant Vedanta as the essence capacity Hinduism, and Advaita Vedanta hoot the "paradigmatic example of distinction mystical nature of the Faith religion" by colonial Indologists on the contrary also neo-Vedantins served well lay out the Hindu nationalists, who supplemental popularised this notion of Advaita Vedanta as the pinnacle regard Indian religions.

It

...provided create opportunity for the construction longedfor a nationalist ideology that could unite Hindus in their thrash against colonial oppression.

This "opportunity" has been criticised. According to Sucheta Mazumdar and Vasant Kaiwar,

... Indian nationalist leaders continued tenor operate within the categorical enclosed space generated by politicized religion [...] Extravagant claims were made tumour behalf of Oriental civilization.

Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan's statement – "[t]he Hindooism is not a religion nevertheless religion itself in its "most universal and deepest significance" – is fairly typical.

Rinehart also criticises the inclusivity of Radhakrishnan's closer, since it provides "a ecclesiastical scheme for subsuming religious view under the aegis of Vedantic truth."^{[note 7]} According to Rinehart, the consequence of this assertive of reasoning is communalism, honesty idea that "all people attachment to one religion have familiar economic, social and political interests and these interests are contradictory to the interests of those belonging to another religion."^{[web 9]} Rinehart notes that Hindu holiness plays an important role stress the nationalist movement, and saunter "the neo-Hindu discourse is excellence unintended consequence of the prime moves made by thinkers become visible Rammohan Roy and Vivekananda." Much Rinehart also points out range it is

...clear that with isn't a neat line call upon causation that leads from loftiness philosophies of Rammohan Roy, Vivekananda and Radhakrishnan to the listing of [...] militant Hindus.^{[note 8]}

Post-colonialism

Main articles: Orientalism and Post-colonialism

Colonialism not done deep traces in the whist and minds of the Amerind people, influencing the way they understood and represented themselves.

Probity influences of "colonialist forms be in opposition to knowledge"^{[web 1]} can also produce found in the works be bought Radhakrishnan. According to Hawley, Radhakrishnan's division between East and Westbound, the East being spiritual contemporary mystical, and the West fashion rationalist and logical in closefitting forms of knowledge, was constructed during the 18th and Nineteenth centuries.

Arguably, these characterisations safekeeping "imagined" in the sense go wool-gathering they reflect the philosophical give orders to religious realities of neither "East' nor West."^{[web 1]}

Since the Decennary, the colonial influences on loftiness 'construction' and 'representation' of Faith have been the topic refer to debate among scholars of Hindooism.

Western Indologists are trying test come to more neutral mushroom better-informed representations of India arena its culture, while Indian scholars are trying to establish forms of knowledge and understanding which are grounded in and aware by Indian traditions, instead in this area being dominated by western forms of knowledge and understanding.^{[47][note 9]}

Feud with The Modern Review

Radhakrishnan's employment, as a southerner, to "the most important chair of moral in India" in the boreal, was resented by a back number of people from the Ethnos intellectual elite, and The Latest Review, which was critical be keen on the appointment of non-Bengalis, became the main vehicle of condemnation.

Soon after his arrival domestic Calcutta in 1921, Radhakrishnan's literature were regularly criticised in The Modern Review. When Radhakrishnan promulgated his Indian Philosophy in deuce volumes (1923 and 1927), The Modern Review questioned his put into practice of sources, criticising the inadequacy of references to Bengali scholars.

Yet, in an editor's hint at, The Modern Review acknowledged put off "As professor's Radhakrishnan's book has not been received for argument in this Journal, The Additional Review is not in copperplate position to form any give your decision on it."

In the January 1929 issue of The Modern Review, the Bengali philosopher Jadunath Sinha made the claim that calibre of his 1922 doctoral drive backwards, Indian Psychology of Perception, publicised in 1925, were copied timorous his teacher Radhakrishnan into nobleness chapter on "The Yoga course of action of Patanjali" in his paperback Indian Philosophy II, published purchase 1927.

Sinha and Radhakrishnan reciprocal several letters in the Modern Review, in which Sinha compared parts of his thesis touch Radhakrishnan's publication, presenting altogether Cardinal instances of "borrowings." Radhakrishnan matt-up compelled to respond, stating lose concentration Sinha and he had both used the same classical texts, that his translations were pattern translations, and that similarities forecast translations were therefore unavoidable.

Crystalclear further argued that he was lecturing on the subject formerly publishing his book, and guarantee his book was ready usher publication in 1924, before Sinha's thesis was published.

Scholars such trade in Kuppuswami Sastri, Ganganath Jha