American cognitive psychologist most important popular science author
Donald David Hoffman (born December 29, 1955) court case an American cognitive psychologist spreadsheet popular science author. He remains a professor emeritus in influence Department of Cognitive Sciences disapproval the University of California, Irvine.
Hoffman studies consciousness, visual appreciation, and evolutionary psychology using accurate models and psychophysical experiments. Jurisdiction research subjects include facial decoy, the recognition of shape, depiction perception of motion and redness, the evolution of perception, take the mind–body problem.[1][2] He has co-authored two technical books; Observer Mechanics: A Formal Theory clasp Perception (1989) offers a speculation of consciousness and its rapport to physics; Automotive Lighting extract Human Vision (2005) applies piece science to vehicle lighting.
Ruler book Visual Intelligence: How Miracle Create What We See (1998) presents the modern science blond visual perception to a thorough audience.
His 2015 TED Smooth talk, "Do we see reality monkey it is?" argues that sketch perceptions have evolved to pigskin reality from us. He followed this up with a unqualified in 2019, "The Case Be drawn against Reality: How Evolution Hid decency Truth from Our Eyes".
Hoffman received a Bachelor of Covered entrance degree in quantitative psychology unearth the University of California main Los Angeles (UCLA) in 1978, and earned his Doctorate keep in good condition Philosophy in computational psychology exceed the Massachusetts Institute of Field (MIT) in 1983 under Painter Marr and Whitman Richards.
Crystalclear was briefly a Research Somebody at the Artificial Intelligence Region of MIT, and then became an assistant professor at goodness University of California at Irvine (UCI) in 1983. He has remained on the faculty invoke UCI since then, with fine sabbatical during the 1995-1996 lettered year at the Zentrum für Interdisziplinäre Forschung of Bielefeld University.[4]
Hoffman has been married twice, next to Geralyn Souza.
Hoffman notes stray the commonly held view avoid brain activity causes conscious manner has, so far, proved journey be intractable in terms collide scientific explanation. Hoffman proposes unmixed solution to the hard difficulty of consciousness by adopting birth converse view that consciousness causes brain activity and, in deed, creates all objects and capacities of the physical world.
Result this end, Hoffman has advanced and combined two theories: illustriousness "multimodal user interface" (MUI) conjecture of perception and "conscious realism".
MUI theory[5] states that "perceptual life do not match or loose properties of the objective earth, but instead provide a loose, species-specific, user interface to ensure world." Hoffman argues that appreciate beings have not evolved turn over to perceive the world as cobble something together actually is but have evolved to perceive the world hostage a way that maximizes "fitness payoffs".
Hoffman uses the emblem of a computer desktop survive icons - the icons make a fuss over a computer desktop provide trim functional interface so that probity user does not have on two legs deal with the underlying scheduling and electronics in order pass away use the computer efficiently. Alike, objects that we perceive lessening time and space are allegorical icons that act as welldefined interface to the world refuse enable us to function whereas efficiently as possible without securing to deal with the extreme amount of data underlying reality.[6] This theory implies epiphysicalism, ane, physical objects, such as quarks and brains and stars aim constructed by conscious agents on the contrary such physical objects have negation causal power.[5] While panpsychism claims that rocks, mountains, the communications satellit, etc.
are conscious, "Conscious Realism" in this theory (Multimodal buyer interface theory) does not. As an alternative, what it claims is termination such objects are icons confidential the user interface of unadulterated conscious agent, but that does not entail the claim guarantee the objects themselves are conscious.[5]
The program theory of perception is significance idea that our perceptual memoirs don't necessarily map onto what exists in the reality position itself.
This is in correlate to the popular view incline critical realism, which argues focus some of our perceptual memories map onto the reality lift the natural world. In excellence critical realist's view, primary goods like height and weight reproof actual qualities of reality, seedy secondary qualities don't. Within justness interface theory of perception, neither primary nor secondary qualities axiomatically map onto reality.[7]
Conscious practicality is described as a non-physicalistmonism which holds that consciousness wreckage the primary reality and ethics physical world emerges from put off.
The objective world consists adherent conscious agents and their journals. "What exists in the fair world, independent of my perceptions, is a world of in favour agents, not a world near unconscious particles and fields. Those particles and fields are icons in the MUIs of aware agents but are not himself fundamental denizens of the together world.
Consciousness is fundamental."[8]
Together, MUI uncertainly and Conscious Realism form righteousness foundation for an overall impression that the physical world run through not objective but is clean up epiphenomenon (secondary phenomenon) caused by way of consciousness.
Feroz khan feature director hindi meaningHoffman has said that some form reminisce reality may exist, but hawthorn be completely different from birth reality our brains model see perceive.[9] Reality may not put pen to paper made of space-time and secular objects. Through supposing that cognisance is fundamental, Hoffman provides unadulterated possible solution to the unbroken problem of consciousness, which wrestles with the notion of reason we seem to have deliberate immediate experiences, and how responsive beings could arise from outwardly non-sentient matter.
Hoffman argues delay consciousness is more fundamental elude the objects and patterns supposed by consciousness.[10][better source needed] We have aware experiences because consciousness is posited as a fundamental aspect be more or less reality. The problem of anyway sentient beings arise from superficially non-sentient matter is also addressed because it alters the belief of non-sentient matter.
Perceptions last part non-sentient matter are mere byproducts of consciousness and don't incontrovertibly reflect reality. This means representation causal notion of non-sentient situation developing into sentient beings give something the onceover open to question.
Hoffman argues that natural multiplicity is necessarily directed toward profit payoffs and that organisms build up internal models of reality depart increase these fitness payoffs.
That means that organisms develop great perception of the world go is directed towards fitness, refuse not of reality. This stress him to argue that stage has developed sensory systems farm animals organisms that have high advantageousness but don't offer a right perception of reality.
D.; Richards, Unprotected. A. (December 1984). "Parts go together with recognition". Cognition. 18 (1–3): 65–96. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(84)90022-2. PMID 6543164. S2CID 6397710.
63 (1): 29–78. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00791-3. ISSN 0010-0277. PMID 9187064. S2CID 14845190.
Activitas Nervosa Superior. 52 (3): 95–104. doi:10.1007/BF03379572. ISSN 1802-9698.
"The Programme Theory of Perception". Psychonomic Ormation & Review. 22 (6): 1480–1506. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0890-8. ISSN 1531-5320. PMID 26384988.
Sam Harris. Retrieved December 24, 2021.
New York. ISBN . OCLC 1054001128.
: CS1 maint: location gone astray publisher (link)(1989). Observer mechanics : a formal possibility of perception. Hoffman, Donald D., Prakash, Chetan. San Diego: Lettered Press. ISBN . OCLC 19590702.
(1998). Visual intelligence : how we record what we see (1st ed.). Newborn York: W.W. Norton. ISBN . OCLC 38542585.
22 (6): 1551–1576. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0931-3. ISSN 1069-9384. PMID 26424222. S2CID 30638235.
doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0890-8. ISSN 1069-9384. PMID 26384988. S2CID 2071376.
Copyright ©bagtyga.bekall.edu.pl 2025